Carlin Communications, Inc. And Drake Publishers, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “any solution to the dial-a-porn problem would not necessarily be rendered unacceptable merely because it did not cover coin calling” because few minors have enough money to afford coin calling and there is evidence that very few calls to IP’s are received from payphones

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).