· 7/24/1980
Carlile v. Fox (In Re Fox)
Citations
- 5 B.R. 317
- 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 4770
- 6 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state law relevant, but not controlling
- necessaries indicate alimony or support
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John Flowers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.