· 6/1/1925
Carley v. Matthes
Citations
- 6 F.2d 718
- 56 App. D.C. 20
- 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that PUC does not have statutory discretion to fail to regulate utility’s provision of incidental services to customers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.