Skip to main content
· 6/1/1925

Carley v. Matthes

Citations

  • 6 F.2d 718
  • 56 App. D.C. 20
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that PUC does not have statutory discretion to fail to regulate utility’s provision of incidental services to customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.