· 5/8/1891
Carley v. Graves
Citations
- 85 Mich. 483
- 48 N.W. 710
- 1891 Mich. LEXIS 719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding controversy over validity of board resolution was ripe even though board had not yet taken action consistent with its resolution
- stating that a declaratory judgment action must present “a judicially protectible right or status which is placed in jeopardy by the ripe or ripening seeds of an actual controversy with an adversary party”
- court may decide validity of proposed contract; jurisdiction exists to decide a declaratory judgment action “although the [s]tatus quo between the parties has not yet been destroyed or impaired”
- court may decide validity of proposed contract; jurisdiction exists to decide a declaratory judgment action \although the [s]tatus quo between the parties has not yet been destroyed or impaired\
- declaratory judgment construing contract's validity proper before claimants even asked to sign contracts
- declaratory judgment construing contract’s validity proper before claimants even asked to sign contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Champlin, Grant, Long, McGrath, Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.