Skip to main content
· 5/8/1891

Carley v. Graves

Citations

  • 85 Mich. 483
  • 48 N.W. 710
  • 1891 Mich. LEXIS 719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding controversy over validity of board resolution was ripe even though board had not yet taken action consistent with its resolution
  • stating that a declaratory judgment action must present “a judicially protectible right or status which is placed in jeopardy by the ripe or ripening seeds of an actual controversy with an adversary party”
  • court may decide validity of proposed contract; jurisdiction exists to decide a declaratory judgment action “although the [s]tatus quo between the parties has not yet been destroyed or impaired”
  • court may decide validity of proposed contract; jurisdiction exists to decide a declaratory judgment action \although the [s]tatus quo between the parties has not yet been destroyed or impaired\
  • declaratory judgment construing contract's validity proper before claimants even asked to sign contracts
  • declaratory judgment construing contract’s validity proper before claimants even asked to sign contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Champlin, Grant, Long, McGrath, Morse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.