Carlester Tapp v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• see also Gaul v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 134 F.3d 576, 580 (3d Cir. 1998)
• “The test [for a “regarded as” claim] is whether the employer perceived [the employee] as impaired, whether or not the perceived impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.” (quotations and alteration omitted)
• “The test [for a “regarded as” claim] is whether the employer perceived [the employee] as impaired, whether or not the perceived impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.” (quotations and alteration omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).