Carla A. Yuknis v. First Student, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that target area harassment can contribute to a hostile work environment
• opining that the term “second‐hand harassment” performs “no analytic func‐ tion and is better avoided” because it “tends to obscure” im‐ material differences between certain types of harassing con‐ duct
• noting that there need not be “an intention of causing distress or offense” and that women in a workplace may state a claim for harassment even though “[t]he darts were aimed elsewhere, and hit the women by accident”
• suggesting, in dicta, that a workplace where “pornographic pictures were exhibited on the walls” might be sufficiently hostile to women to support a claim under Title VII
• suggesting, in dicta, that a workplace where \pornographic pictures were exhibited on the walls\ might be sufficiently hostile to women to support a claim under Title VII
• suggesting, in dicta, that a workplace where “pornographic pictures were exhibited on the walls” might be sufficiently hostile to women to support a claim under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).