Carl v. Tirado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary affirmance is proper when the movant shows that “the basic facts are both uncomplicated and undisputed, and that the lower court’s ruling rests on a narrow and clear-cut issue of law”
• “substantial evidence” available in District, where father lived in District, child was baptized in District, child was cared for by father during day in District, extended family lived in District, and mother had brought suit for child support in District

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).