Skip to main content
· 4/19/1995

Carl v. Angelone

Citations

  • 883 F. Supp. 1433
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5553
  • 1995 WL 245572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a BFOQ might be justified on the ground of “simple decency in order to afford female inmates as much privacy as possible, even if not constitutionally mandated or protected”
  • stating that a BFOQ might be justified on the ground of “simple decency in order to afford female inmates as much privacy as possible, even if not constitutionally mandated or protected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.