Skip to main content
· 7/16/2015

Carl Schroeder v. United States

Citations

  • 793 F.3d 1080
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12287
  • 2015 D.A.R. 8198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an argument that “urges us to untenably assume the role of a superlegislature second-guessing the policy choices of the other branches of government” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Rawlinson, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.