· 7/16/2015
Carl Schroeder v. United States
Citations
- 793 F.3d 1080
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12287
- 2015 D.A.R. 8198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting an argument that “urges us to untenably assume the role of a superlegislature second-guessing the policy choices of the other branches of government” (cleaned up)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, Rawlinson, Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.