Skip to main content
· 8/14/1973

Carl Reed, Jr. v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff

Citations

  • 483 F.2d 77
  • 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the [district] court, sua sponte, might require the defendants to formulate and serve a motion for a more definite statement on petitioner under Rule 12(e) . . . in an effort to ascertain the facts for use in proceedings short of trial.”
  • stating that “the [district] court, sua sponte, might require the defendants to formulate and serve a motion for a more definite statement on petitioner under Rule 12(e) . . . in an effort to ascertain the facts for use in proceedings short of trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Godbold, In-Graham, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.