Carl R. Kramer v. Village of North Fond Du Lac and Larry Wodack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants waived Heck as a defense by failing to raise it
• noting that there may be “reasons that are not apparent from the record . . . that Heck is not applicable to those claims” and declining to forgive defendants’ waiver
• “Thus, plaintiff’s contention that his Fourth Amendment claim does not imply the invalidity of his conviction, a contention that defendants have not challenged, is sufficient to remove that claim from Heck’s bar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).