Carl Morse v. Southern Union Company, a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding close to a 1:6 ratio where the compensatory award was only $70,000
• “It was the jury’s function to consider the competing evidence and the competing views of that evidence.”
• listing larger punitive damages awards upheld to deter employment discrimination
• listing larger punitive damages awards upheld to deter employment discrimination
• considering net worth of defendant as relevant to the analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).