Carl Michael Smith v. Harry Pinell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there is no \justification for qualifying a seaman's rights under the Jones Act by incorporating a state's substantive law governing an action for rescission\
• stating that there is no “justification for qualifying a seaman’s rights under the Jones Act by incorporating a state’s substantive law governing an action for rescission”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).