Skip to main content
· 8/17/1993

Carl M. Martahus, D/B/A Video Cassette Duplication Services v. Video Duplication Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 417
  • 27 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1846
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20852
  • 1993 WL 309172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A ‘trade name’ is any name used by a person to identify his or her business or vocation”
  • “A trade name which also has significance as either a trademark or a service mark may be registered, whereas a trade name lacking any such significance may not”
  • “a trade name lacking any independent trademark or service mark significance may bar registration [under Section 2(d)] of a trademark or service mark that is confusingly similar to that trade name”
  • “We review any factual findings underlying a priority determination for clear error.”
  • “mere attorney arguments unsubstantiated by record evidence are suspect at best”
  • “[M]ere attorney arguments unsubstantiated by record evidence are suspect at best.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Lourie, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.