Carl M. Loeb, Jr. v. Laurence Hammond and Kirkpatrick W. Dilling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error in trial court's exclusion of expert testimony on legal significance of documents, a matter of contract interpretation
• testimony of attorney on legal significance of documents was properly excluded
• testimony of attorney on legal significance of documents was properly excluded
• “The question of interpretation of the contract is for the jury and the question of legal effect is for the judge. In neither case do we permit expert testimony.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).