Skip to main content
· 4/8/2024

Carl Leonard Looper v. Stanley Shadburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it was improper to group tax evasion and wire fraud counts under 3D1.2(c) because the counts involved different types of conduct and harm, and a sentence resulting from grouping would fail to represent the significance of the criminal conduct embodied in each count
  • reaffirming Astorri and rejecting Haltom, leaving open a little wiggle room for situations in which the adjustment by the tax evasion enhancement actually alters the final offense level

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.