Carl L. Buggs v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Government had waived the petitioner’s procedural default by not arguing that the petitioner’s claim was procedurally defaulted
• \[E]rrors in the implementation of the Sentencing Guidelines are generally not cognizable in a collateral attack.\
• “[A] claim based on insufficiency of evidence raises a constitutional issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).