Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim preclusion applied because both suits stemmed from plaintiff's termination
• holding bare reference to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in string citation not enough to make out claim of diversity jurisdiction
• noting as part of transactional test whether suits \sought redress for essentially the same basic wrong\
• noting as part of transactional test whether suits “sought redress for essentially the same basic wrong”
• “all claims which are part of the same cause of action are extinguished, whether or not asserted in the original action”
• “Once there has been an adjudication on the merits, federal law stipulates that all claims which are ‘part of the same cause of action’ are extinguished, whether or not actually asserted in the original action.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).