Skip to main content
· 3/15/1994

Carl Henderson v. United States Parole Commission and Patrick W. Keohane, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 1073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a court can overturn a disciplinary decision “only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found [the petitioner] guilty of the offense on the basis of the evidence presented”
  • finding that a court can overturn a disciplinary decision “only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found [the petitioner] guilty of the offense on the basis of the evidence presented”
  • a court can overturn a disciplinary decision only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found the inmate guilty of the offense based on the evidence presented
  • a court can overturn a disciplinary decision only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found the inmate guilty of the offense based on the evidence presented
  • a court can overturn a disciplinary decision only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found the inmate guilty of the offense based on the evidence presented
  • a court can overturn a disciplinary decision only if no reasonable adjudicator could have found the inmate guilty of the offense based on the evidence presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.