Carl H. COCKRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff-employee had presented sufficient evidence of intolerable working conditions, and therefore a constructive discharge, to survive a directed verdict, based on evidence of a perceived demotion and reduction in salary
• reversing directed verdict for employer because facts could support constructive-discharge finding where employee believed he would receive 40% pay cut along with demotion from managing five lumberyards to one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).