Carl E. Berg v. Hayden Leason Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe Paul Alexander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding federal removal jurisdiction was not proper in a malicious prosecution case
• finding no jurisdic- tion over a malicious prosecution claim, where the alleg- edly unlawful prosecution was for violations of federal securities law and the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act
• “A state court can decide as competently as can a federal court whether the threshold of a ‘legally tenable’ claim existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).