Carl D. McQuillion v. William Duncan, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering prisoner’s immediate release without parole where “three-yéar parole, which he would have been required to serve if he had been released on time [in 1994], has long since expired”
• reciting the 21 same legal standard in adjudicating a Rule 59(e) motion
• “[a] Rule 59(e) motion should not be granted 28 ‘unless the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law’” (inner citation omitted)
• affirming habeas grant to prisoner serving indeterminate life sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).