Skip to main content
· 3/1/1974

Carl Bolander & Sons Inc. v. United Stockyards Corp.

Citations

  • 215 N.W.2d 473
  • 298 Minn. 428
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the use of the term “assuming that” in the contracted created a condition precedent
  • stating that this court will not disregard the plain language of the contract in the guise of effectuating the parties’ unexpressed intent
  • explaining that a condition precedent is a fact that must occur before the promisor is obligated to perform
  • declining to disregard the plain language of the contract in the guise of effectuating the parties’ unexpressed intent
  • noting, where language may be interpreted according to its plain meaning, there is no room for construction
  • noting, where language may be interpreted according to its plain meaning, there is no room for construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson, Otis, MacLaughlin, Mulally, Sheran, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.