Carl and Janice Duffner v. City of St. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the church in the St. Johns case raised its constitutional claims when applying for a variance
• rejecting city’s argument that appellants conceded the validity of the ordinance by applying for and receiving a variance
• attack on the validity of a zoning ordinance, including substantive due process challenge, does not require exhaustion pursuant to RSMo § 89.110

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).