Cariveau v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an expert could rely on newspaper articles, pretrial testimony, and conversations with colleagues
• noting that a 17 § 1985(3) claim requires “the existence of a conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of the equal protection of the laws”
• identifying a general rule of waiver for issues not raised below, subject to a discretionary exception
• identifying a general rule of waiver for issues not raised below, subject to a discretionary exception
• explaining courts have discretion to consider issue raised for the first time on appeal when “the issue presented is purely one of law and either 4 does not depend on the factual record developed below, or the pertinent record has been fully developed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).