Carhart v. Reviere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a written acknowledgment does not restart the statute of limitations under § 17-101 if it was not “communicated to the plaintiff or to anyone on his behalf, nor intended to influence the plaintiffs conduct in any manner”
• a written acknowledgment does not restart the statute of limitations under § 17–101 if it was not “communicated to the plaintiff or to anyone on his behalf, nor intended to influence the plaintiff's conduct in any manner”
• documents were insufficient to take a debt out of the statute of limitations under Section 17-101 when the documents were “neither communicated to the plaintiff or to anyone on his behalf, nor intended to influence the plaintiffs conduct in any manner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).