Skip to main content
· 5/15/1841

Cargill v. Sewall

Citations

  • 19 Me. 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there was no evidence that appellant was experiencing substantial deterioration of her ability to function independently in part because there was no evidence in the record that appellant “could not provide for her own food, clothing, or health”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whitman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.