Skip to main content
· 8/28/2002

Cargill Inc. v. Trico Steel Co. (In Re Trico Steel Co.)

Citations

  • 282 B.R. 318
  • 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1004
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 948
  • 2002 WL 2008198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “mere intermediaries in the transport” of goods do not qualify as agents
  • describing this comment as “highlighting] the distinction between ‘delivery’ (when title passes) and ‘receipt’ ”
  • “Although title may have passed to [the buyer] pursuant to the terms of the contract, those terms did not transfer actual physical possession of the [goods].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary F. Walrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.