Cargile v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that metabolites of marijuana in defendant’s urine constituted sufficient circumstantial evidence that defendant possessed marijuana 14 substance in King’s mouth was (1) physical evidence and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bryan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-09-23· cited 23×
• King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-09· cited 10×
• State of Idaho v. Shami Yakovac
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-11-03
• Prado v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-30
• Shala King v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-09
• Raul Prado v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-04-12· cited 167×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-12-03· cited 86×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-04-23· cited 75×
• McKissick v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-05-10· cited 46×
• Adkinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-05· cited 17×
• Kennedy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-20· cited 6×
• Reed v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-06· cited 1×