Carfi v. De Martino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a purchaser was not entitled to equitable subrogation because he did not pay “debts under an agreement, express or implied, . . . that he would be subrogated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).