· 3/24/1976
Carey v. Sugar
Citations
- 425 U.S. 73
- 96 S. Ct. 1208
- 47 L. Ed. 2d 587
- 1976 U.S. LEXIS 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- federal court should abstain from deciding constitutionality of a state statute while state court interpretations of the statute were evolving
- Pullman abstention ordered in case challenging, under the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause, state’s prejudgment attachment statute where state courts had demonstrated their inclination to impose a constitutionally permissible gloss on the questioned statute
- state officials urged narrowing construction of challenged statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.