Skip to main content
· 3/24/1976

Carey v. Sugar

Citations

  • 425 U.S. 73
  • 96 S. Ct. 1208
  • 47 L. Ed. 2d 587
  • 1976 U.S. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • federal court should abstain from deciding constitutionality of a state statute while state court interpretations of the statute were evolving
  • Pullman abstention ordered in case challenging, under the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause, state’s prejudgment attachment statute where state courts had demonstrated their inclination to impose a constitutionally permissible gloss on the questioned statute
  • state officials urged narrowing construction of challenged statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.