Skip to main content
· 11/21/1910

Carey v. Seifert

Citations

  • 44 Pa. Super. 577
  • 1910 Pa. Super. LEXIS 223

Syllabus

<p>Mechanic’s lien — Implied contract — Breach of contract.</p> <p>1. A builder who is engaged to erect a small building not defined by any specific plan at a price to be determined by the amount of labor and material required, may file a mechanic’s lien for work done and material furnished. The mechanic’s lien act provided for implied contracts.</p> <p>Contract — Entire contract — Performance—Instructions.</p> <p>2. Where in an action on a mechanic’s lien the jury finds as a fact that the agreement between the parties did not amount to an entire contract for the completion of the work at a fixed price, the trial judge cannot be convicted of error in refusing to charge that if the plaintiff failed in the performance of his contract in any material matter he could recover nothing.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.