Skip to main content
· 10/1/2007

Carey v. Chaparral Boats, Inc.

Citations

  • 514 F. Supp. 2d 1152
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73382
  • 2007 WL 2893375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the implied warranty of merchantability “is breached when the product is defective to a normal buyer making ordinary use of the product”
  • declining to hold that a repair-and-replace clause failed of its essential purpose when “[t]he undisputed record [was] that the repairs were successful”
  • cracking of a boat’s finish amounts to a “cosmetic problem” that “in no way affects” the boat’s ordinary use and, therefore, does not breach an implied warranty of merchantability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ann D. Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.