Carey v. Burke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it reasonable for plaintiff to turn her attention to setting up a business with her husband after searching unsuccessfully for employment
• remanding “for the district court to either grant reinstatement or, if the court determines reinstatement is inappropriate, to set out the extraordinary circumstances ... which cause it to reach that conclusion[ ]”
• claimant entitled to back pay for six to eight months spent initiating own business without remuneration
• “defendant left the determination of plaintiff’s diligence to be decided by the court based upon its assessment of plaintiff’s credibility”
• ‘‘Title VII claimants are . . . presumptively entitled to rein- statement under the ‘make whole’ policy’’
• district court must set forth circumstances warranting denial of reinstatement or front pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).