Skip to main content
· 5/6/1998

Carey v. Askenase (In Re Carey)

Citations

  • 221 B.R. 571
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 551
  • 1998 WL 321098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where the “injunction against refiling has expired, there is presently no reviewable controversy”
  • “[S]ince any injunction against refiling has expired, there is presently no reviewable controversy.” (citing In re Frieouf, 938 F.2d 1099)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Votolato, Lamoutte, Carlo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.