Skip to main content
· 1/29/2014

Carey Mills v. United States

Citations

  • 742 F.3d 400
  • 2014 WL 320972
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1821

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting among other requirements of 23 standing, a plaintiff must assert his own legal rights and interests and not the legal rights or 24 interests of third parties
  • “In construing the scope of the QTA’s waiver, we have read narrowly the requirement that the title at issue be ‘disputed.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, Berzon, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.