Carestio v. School Bd. of Broward County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was a factual dispute as to whether immunity applied under section 768.28 where “the employees were acting within the scope of their authority”
• explaining that section 768.28 “outlines a limitation on the State’s vicarious liability in certain circumstances” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).