Caren Cronk Thomas and Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding an insurance requirement where “[t]he required amount and the cost of the insurance depend only on the size of the event and the nature of the facilities involved in it (a bandstand, stage, tents, and so forth)”
• “[T]o allow unregulated access to all comers could easily reduce rather than enlarge ... [a venue’s] utility as a forum for speech.”
• “[A] majority [of the Graff court] believed that the [certiorari] judicial review procedure was good enough for a regulation of expressive activity when the regulation is not a form of censorship . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).