Skip to main content
· 5/30/2003

Care Choices Hmo, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Elizabeth Engstrom, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 330 F.3d 786
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10751
  • 2003 WL 21242538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching a similar conclusion as to 42 U.S.C. § 1395mm(e)(4), which addresses secondary payment by Medicare-substitute HMOs
  • reaching a similar conclusion as to 42 U.S.C. § 1395mm(e)(4), which addresses secondary payment by Medicare- substitute HMOs
  • same for the analogous rule for HMO plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Siler, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.