Cardwell v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Stone preclusion applicable to confessions challenged on Fourth Amendment grounds
• reversing grant of habeas corpus where circuit court of appeals had found that there was an unattenuated causal link between the custodial statements made by respondent and a violation of the Fourth Amendment
• Stone applied in case where petitioner sought to exclude statements made pursuant to allegedly unlawful arrest
• a habeas court is barred from reviewing a claim that petitioner’s arrest violated the Fourth Amendment and, thus, custodial statements taken thereafter should have been excluded from evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).