· 4/23/1975
Cardwell v. Hogan
Citations
- 534 P.2d 283
- 23 Ariz. App. 475
- 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 590
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- impinging on constitutional rights for security or rehabilitative purposes permissible when actions are reasonable and fall within wide range of discretion given prison authorities
- “Wide discretion is vested in correctional authorities in matters of internal prison administration, and reasonable action within the scope of this discretion does not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.