Skip to main content
· 4/23/1975

Cardwell v. Hogan

Citations

  • 534 P.2d 283
  • 23 Ariz. App. 475
  • 1975 Ariz. App. LEXIS 590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • impinging on constitutional rights for security or rehabilitative purposes permissible when actions are reasonable and fall within wide range of discretion given prison authorities
  • “Wide discretion is vested in correctional authorities in matters of internal prison administration, and reasonable action within the scope of this discretion does not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway, Howard, Krucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.