Cardoza v. Cardoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \A trial judge is vested with broad discretionary powers in the conduct and during progress of a trial. His exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless abused or material harm be done to the complaining party.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Polson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1959-04-22· cited 49×
• State v. Wendler
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1961-03-23· cited 17×
• Seamons v. Spackman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1959-07-06· cited 9×
• Safaris Unlimited, LLC v. Von Jones
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2018-06-29· cited 5×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Buehman v. Smelker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-06-01· cited 27×