Cardona v. Del Granado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant was not required to file a motion for new trial or a judgment n.o.v. in order to challenge the court’s order on appeal
• “Due to the inadequate nature of the record,” which rendered “meaningful review of the defendant’s contention *** impossible,” the court presumed, per Foutch, that the trial court’s order granting a new trial was entered in conformity with law and had a sufficient factual basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).