Cardona v. Board of Election Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that whether information contained in a receipt filed by a candidate complied with the requirements of the Election Code was a mixed question of fact and law
• stating that whether information contained in a receipt filed by a candidate complied with the requirements of the Election Code was a mixed question of fact and law
• stating that whether information contained in a receipt filed by a candidate complied with the requirements of the Election Code was a mixed question of fact and law
• receipt evidencing filing of candidate's statement of economic interests listed the office sought as \candidate;\ court found that any inadequacy in receipt could not result in ballot removal
• receipt evidencing filing of candidate’s statement of economic interests listed the office sought as “candidate”; court found that any inadequacy in receipt could not result in ballot removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).