CardioVention, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying California law and ruling that “information that become[s] publicly available after the time of the misappropriation is irrelevant to the existence of a trade secret at the time of the misappropriation.”
• “[I]nformation that become[s] publicly available after the time of the misappropriation is irrelevant to the existence of a trade secret at the time of the misappropriation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).