· 11/5/1999
Cardinal Holding Co. v. Deal
Citations
- 522 S.E.2d 614
- 258 Va. 623
- 1999 Va. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reading “[fees] incurred because of the filing of the pleading” in Va. Code § 8.01-271.1 as permitting a recovery of those fees and expenses incurred in pursuing a sanctions award arising out of such a claim
- permitting “a recovery of such fees and expenses incurred in defending against an unwarranted claim, but also a recovery of those fees and expenses incurred in pursuing a sanctions award arising out of such a claim”
- attorney sanctioned for maintaining suit based on assigned legal malpractice claim after MNC v. Sickels was decided
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrico, Compton, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Kinser, Whiting
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.