Skip to main content
· 8/25/1988

Cardinal Construction Co. v. Besmec, Inc.

Citations

  • 701 F. Supp. 1274
  • 62 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5619
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13735
  • 1988 WL 132324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mandamus is appropriate to review compliance with discretionary standards and nondiscretionary commands set forth in an earlier opinion concerning the parties.”
  • release of future claims was an important element of antitrust settlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Copenhaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.