Cardin v. Pacific Employers Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in regard to the insurer’s duty to defend, a cause of action for an insurer’s denial of payment of defenses costs accrued on the date of denial
• finding negotiations and subsequent communication between parties, after insurer rejected -payment did not extend limitation period
• \[T]he [Maryland] Court [of Appeals] did not hold. . . that in every circumstance where a reservation of rights is made due to the presence of covered and uncovered claims a conflict is created.\
• \[T]he [Maryland] Court [of Appeals] did not hold. . . that in every circumstance where a reservation of rights is made due to the presence of covered and uncovered claims a conflict is created.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).