Cardiello v. Seaton (In Re Seaton)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retirement funds were not held in trust where review of plan documents showed that there was no trustee for the purported trust
• stating with respect to retirement plan that “even though a plan trustee is a fiduciary of such plan, a plan fiduciary need not necessarily be a trustee of such plan”
• “[A] [401(k)] plan fiduciary need not necessarily be a trustee of such plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).