Cardiac Anesthesia Services, PLLC v. Jon Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Non-moving] parties may deflect a summary judgment motion challenging their ability to prove an essential element of their case by (1
• affirming summary judgment on the basis that that the client had constructive notice of an injury
• noting that one way to respond to a motion for summary judgment is to submit “an affidavit explaining the necessity for further discovery pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.06” (quoting Martin v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 271 S.W.3d 76, 84 (Tenn. 2008))
• ―[W]hen a non-moving party fails to respond to the moving party‘s statement of undisputed facts, the court may consider the facts admitted.‖
• “It is well-settled that, when a non-moving party fails to respond to the moving party’s statement of undisputed facts, the court may consider the facts admitted.”
• “It is well-settled that, when a non-moving party fails to respond to the moving party's statement of undisputed facts, the court may consider the facts admitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).